My (real world) friend Jay Reynolds posted this interesting Note over on Facebook.
I had a thought. I’ll repost the start of it here:
it’s easy to control multikilobuck audio interfaces with Apple Remote the dog-simplest controller since the Griffin blue glowing knob thingee. In other words, via iPod Touch or iPhone. Little things controlling/loading from big things.
So now I’m thinking: what if everyone were recording all the time, via decent, but not magical bluetooth mics? The applications are incredible, and not just for film/video. In music we can imagine universal always-on multitrack recording with current tools. Logic and Nuendo do incredible time-stretching out of the box, ProTools HD doesn’t suck, but might need some plug in help to git ‘r done transparently. But even then… so what? Good enough is what works to make a product.
It’s cheap and easy to think of the scary Big Brother problems, but more productive to think of technology in all it’s phases (military, industrial, commercial, domestic) as inevitable and put your energy into applications. I’d argue most of that can be offset by ubiquity and true open-access.
If everyone has equal and open access, the watchers will be the most-watched. This isn’t a wild guess. TV from the beginning has been dominated by cop shows of every format – sitcoms, musicals, animals, buddies alongside reality, fictionalized and fully fictional dramas. Free always on cruiser-cams would be addictive. As to protecting the cops, this is a valid, useful critique, which might validate how access is implemented, as well as guide police procedures. Concern over how people will respond to events outside the time frame of the desired evidence will cause beneficial adjustments in behavior, and define professionalism more clearly.
People are naturally repelled by cruiser-cams of busts. Lots of police departments in Hamilton county use cameras that automagically run license plates as they drive (whether or not the officer wishes to or not, the computer is in charge). Is it any wonder we fear stop-light cams? Bad tactics and implementations don’t mean the tools or even the strategies are necessarily bad.
In this case it’s the opposite. Open access to the tools will yield all sorts of tactics, good, bad and as awful as any the government comes up with. But they will make us all aware of the nature of our lives in this mediated world, while giving us access to things we’ve never imagined. Already your iPhone can track your business mileage (and, if appropriate billable time) easier and more accurately than you can log it with a pad and pencil; tied to your iCal, it can do so automatically with little (or no) intervention on your part. Personal freedom/time, manufactured by social/government network tools (GPS, 3G in this case). Different technologies can do the same thing in a different way – an iPod touch can use wifi to autolocate when you check into your office, or pass a public network along the way. Wouldn’t you like to check if anyone had cleared the parking side streets on the way to work on a snowy day?
The technology for this costs less than the cams that do nothing more than give you tickets. Public street-cams could provide that functionality in an inherently more just manner: they would require an actual officer to examine a real time video of the “violation” to determine whether or not the individual was operating in an unsafe manner. It would allow the officer to easily (as automagically as they can run the plates of cars they pass today) distinguish between daily commuters and strangers. This would form the basis of a new kind of “vision” for the beat cop and citizen alike: a shared public view of the world around them, created by this rich data stream. Again – these applications not only exist already on the police side, newer better-intentioned public applications would quickly spring up, allowing commuters to plan shorter trips and hip people to possible ride-shares, by whatever criteria you feel comfortable with. These coins have two sides.
Always on recording. Audio, for sure. Video, why not? I’m talking the personal level here still. But when you think it through it’s easy to imagine all kinds of public applications for the same thing, that are more positive than the ideas out there now.
-d-