<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has iPod Killed The Radio Star, Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/archives/380/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/archives/380</link>
	<description>design + new media for music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 22:28:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Power Home Solar Review</title>
		<link>http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/archives/380/comment-page-1#comment-4315</link>
		<dc:creator>Power Home Solar Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 06:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/?p=380#comment-4315</guid>
		<description>Great site, I will be back.  Well done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site, I will be back.  Well done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sprewell</title>
		<link>http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/archives/380/comment-page-1#comment-4230</link>
		<dc:creator>sprewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/?p=380#comment-4230</guid>
		<description>Actually, Adam&#039;s radio show numbers were increasing and he was no. 1 in many markets, like Las Vegas or Seattle, but they flipped the whole talk station to music so they dumped him along with all their other talent.  Considering he was making $1.8 mil this year, he chose to ride out his current contract rather than take another radio gig.  I don&#039;t know the details of the antiquated ASCAP/SESAC schemes that you think are representative of micropayments, but online micropayments will actually benefit new entrants much more than established players.  However, they won&#039;t benefit musicians as music will be mostly free for a variety of reasons, digital music will be a marketing cost for paid live concerts.  I agree that it&#039;s great Adam experimented with podcasting and I think he will be an internet superstar, one of the few entertainers who will be able to command a giant audience on the highly fragmented niches of the internet when broadcast is dead.  I&#039;ll give you another example of what replaces broadcast: rather than listening to Brenneman or whichever announcer your TV station hires and imposes, you will just choose the sportscaster audio feed of your choice.  You might choose Brenneman to listen to while watching the video feed, I might choose the Sports Guy Bill Simmons&#039;s game commentary.  Radio, TV, newspapers, all the broadcast media will be dead and gone within a decade and most information will be consumed online.  All we&#039;re missing is the final catalyst, micropayments, which several companies are finally working on, including the WSJ and MySpace.  Once micropayments are here, the old broadcast order which is now collapsing will finally go under, mark my words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Adam&#8217;s radio show numbers were increasing and he was no. 1 in many markets, like Las Vegas or Seattle, but they flipped the whole talk station to music so they dumped him along with all their other talent.  Considering he was making $1.8 mil this year, he chose to ride out his current contract rather than take another radio gig.  I don&#8217;t know the details of the antiquated ASCAP/SESAC schemes that you think are representative of micropayments, but online micropayments will actually benefit new entrants much more than established players.  However, they won&#8217;t benefit musicians as music will be mostly free for a variety of reasons, digital music will be a marketing cost for paid live concerts.  I agree that it&#8217;s great Adam experimented with podcasting and I think he will be an internet superstar, one of the few entertainers who will be able to command a giant audience on the highly fragmented niches of the internet when broadcast is dead.  I&#8217;ll give you another example of what replaces broadcast: rather than listening to Brenneman or whichever announcer your TV station hires and imposes, you will just choose the sportscaster audio feed of your choice.  You might choose Brenneman to listen to while watching the video feed, I might choose the Sports Guy Bill Simmons&#8217;s game commentary.  Radio, TV, newspapers, all the broadcast media will be dead and gone within a decade and most information will be consumed online.  All we&#8217;re missing is the final catalyst, micropayments, which several companies are finally working on, including the WSJ and MySpace.  Once micropayments are here, the old broadcast order which is now collapsing will finally go under, mark my words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/archives/380/comment-page-1#comment-4217</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 02:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/?p=380#comment-4217</guid>
		<description>Nice write up...usually I never reply to these thing but this time I will,Thanks for the great info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write up&#8230;usually I never reply to these thing but this time I will,Thanks for the great info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Davis</title>
		<link>http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/archives/380/comment-page-1#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/?p=380#comment-4062</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll take your word for motives... all we know for sure is audience was declining, and CBS has definitely kept a grip on his career.

Micropayments are a workable model, but the most commonly pitched ideas for implementation are pretty bad: in music industry they differ little from the &quot;DAT Tax&quot; or &quot;CD-R Music&quot; scheme.  People with track records, who have already made it will make a few bucks, everyone else gets scraps.  The most promoted model these days is based on the ASCAP model for broadcast rights tracking, which is inferior to SESACs because it uses charts and other metrics to divine an imaginary  payment schedule.  SESAC polls fewer stations, but bases on all royalty payments on actual spins/plays.  The ASCAP model is convoluted, inherently (and accepted as) inaccurate, and is designed to miss low-volume spins, while over-estimating popularity (and revenue for) hits.  So there&#039;s some work to be done on these models.

The good news: in new media, real numbers are in fact knowable, so there&#039;s no need for the kinds of micropayment schemes being pitched by major labels.

The bad news: throwing up your hands and forcing ISPs to pay some flat statutory rate is model that emphasizes &quot;micro&quot; and really doesn&#039;t solve the bigger problem of generating sufficient revenue to avoid artist dumpster-diving.

Nonetheless, Carolla&#039;s podcast adventure is positive.  It suggests a new kind of programming, and comes with it&#039;s own audience built-in.  Free of the pressure to earn, he&#039;s freed to be more creative, whenever he decides to get up in the morning.  The result is unique content, and a fairly sustainable model by any of the means you mention.  Progress.

I wouldn&#039;t say broadcast is dying, but it&#039;s clearly mutating.  It has a clear role in disseminating local information on a real time basis, and barring major change in the human condition, that&#039;s a real benefit.  Ironically, HD Radio might hurt radio in the short term; it splits the audience, de-emphasizes real-time data, and lacks the universal compatibility and simplicity of analog broadcast (if we were nuked tomorrow, I could build a functioning crystal set from junk laying around my house).  While animated Flash baseball diamonds offer a new way to enjoy a ball game, they pale in comparison to a broadcast by Marty Brenneman.  Games on TV are only as good as the announcers too.  So for some things, radio is pretty ideal and thus will be around for awhile.

Thanks for the comments!  Drop more! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take your word for motives&#8230; all we know for sure is audience was declining, and CBS has definitely kept a grip on his career.</p>
<p>Micropayments are a workable model, but the most commonly pitched ideas for implementation are pretty bad: in music industry they differ little from the &#8220;DAT Tax&#8221; or &#8220;CD-R Music&#8221; scheme.  People with track records, who have already made it will make a few bucks, everyone else gets scraps.  The most promoted model these days is based on the ASCAP model for broadcast rights tracking, which is inferior to SESACs because it uses charts and other metrics to divine an imaginary  payment schedule.  SESAC polls fewer stations, but bases on all royalty payments on actual spins/plays.  The ASCAP model is convoluted, inherently (and accepted as) inaccurate, and is designed to miss low-volume spins, while over-estimating popularity (and revenue for) hits.  So there&#8217;s some work to be done on these models.</p>
<p>The good news: in new media, real numbers are in fact knowable, so there&#8217;s no need for the kinds of micropayment schemes being pitched by major labels.</p>
<p>The bad news: throwing up your hands and forcing ISPs to pay some flat statutory rate is model that emphasizes &#8220;micro&#8221; and really doesn&#8217;t solve the bigger problem of generating sufficient revenue to avoid artist dumpster-diving.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, Carolla&#8217;s podcast adventure is positive.  It suggests a new kind of programming, and comes with it&#8217;s own audience built-in.  Free of the pressure to earn, he&#8217;s freed to be more creative, whenever he decides to get up in the morning.  The result is unique content, and a fairly sustainable model by any of the means you mention.  Progress.</p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say broadcast is dying, but it&#8217;s clearly mutating.  It has a clear role in disseminating local information on a real time basis, and barring major change in the human condition, that&#8217;s a real benefit.  Ironically, HD Radio might hurt radio in the short term; it splits the audience, de-emphasizes real-time data, and lacks the universal compatibility and simplicity of analog broadcast (if we were nuked tomorrow, I could build a functioning crystal set from junk laying around my house).  While animated Flash baseball diamonds offer a new way to enjoy a ball game, they pale in comparison to a broadcast by Marty Brenneman.  Games on TV are only as good as the announcers too.  So for some things, radio is pretty ideal and thus will be around for awhile.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments!  Drop more! <img src='http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sprewell</title>
		<link>http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/archives/380/comment-page-1#comment-4060</link>
		<dc:creator>sprewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicmediadesign.com/blogs/?p=380#comment-4060</guid>
		<description>Ummm no, he didn&#039;t want to get up in the mornings anymore and is busy ramping up production on a CBS pilot for TV.  No doubt broadcast is dying though.  The winning model online will be micropayments, not sponsorship or ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm no, he didn&#8217;t want to get up in the mornings anymore and is busy ramping up production on a CBS pilot for TV.  No doubt broadcast is dying though.  The winning model online will be micropayments, not sponsorship or ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

