NPR’s Ken Tucker on Wussy: Strong Work, And Not Without Pain

Album Review: Ken Tucker on Wussy: Strong Work, And Not Without Pain : NPR Music.

Man, the chips keep piling up for Wussy’s latest!  This time NPR’s Ken Tucker spreads some love and drops (relationship) science on the joint…  Way to go Wussy!

Juggernaut Brew: Digipacks vs. Jewel Box

Digipacks vs. Jewel Case - majority decision reached.

Juggernaut Brew is a great industry blog coming from the UK, asking tough questions and working them through to solutions.  In this post, he takes on the often dissed jewel box (pictured above).

Before our launch, MusicMediaDesign and it’s parent, The All Night Party, held some focus groups on this very topic.  We were somewhat surprised to discover some bands and designers didn’t mind the old standby.  But not surprisingly, this acceptance stopped well-short of love.  The jewel box is tolerated, mostly for cost.

Juggernaut Brew makes the case that sustainability, total carbon footprint, and the long term economics combine with market forces to make the jewel box a loser.  It only seems to cost less, and only in small quantities.  It’s a perpetual stinker ecologically: made of hardened petro-byproducts, non-biodegradable and hardly recyclable.  The CD itself isn’t particularly eco-friendly, but throw in the jewel box and you’ve got a real problem in your hands.

It’s an interesting argument.  And for the record, we prefer alternatives for most projects we design.

-d-

CityBeat: Back to the Hospital

CityBeat’s Alex Weber hits it out of the park with this CB blog post, Take Yourself to the Hospital, Punk which reviews the Hospital Record’s compilation Auto Glamour Sound reissued by Shake It Records a couple years back.  While the record made a few waves when it was released, the historical connections of the bands and people were never made clear in any reviews I saw at the time.  Problem solved!

-d-

Wussy Lighting Up Christgau too!

As per usual, Mr. Christgau, the dean of rock critics, runs it down in his Inside Music list at MSN.  He’s long been into Wussy, so it’s no suprise he gives their latest, “Be Here Now” an A.

Spin Magazine To Wussy: 4 Stars, No Waiting

We can’t resist noting when a local artist or band does good in the World Outside.  Spin and Rolling Stone reviews are pretty rare for Cincy bands on small labels.  But not for Wussy! 

Wussy, ‘Wussy’ (Shake It) | Spin Magazine Online.

Dynamic Range Strikes Back!

Create Digital Music has a piece on the latest front in raging Loudness Wars, which I highly recommend: Dynamic Range Strikes Back with Campaign, Plug-in.  Campaigning against hyper-limited, over-loud CDs is nothing new, and largely a failure.  CDs, and now MP3s, just keep getting louder.  The problem is there’s no way to know what you’re missing, since virtually nothing released has any dynamic range to speak of.  So there are few positive examples of benefits.  The new development is a plug-in that displays dynamic range in a positive way.  The plug shows a simple, single number representing the average level of the program.  Human nature being what it is, bigger is better, so a bigger number suggests more of something, dynamic range in this case.

Dynamic range refers to the difference between quiet and loud parts of a song.  The greater that gap, the more impact the loud parts have, and generally, the more expressive the music can be.  In earlier generations, this expression was a precious commodity, understood by everyone.  Think of marching bands or symphonies: the loud crescendos, as the music peaks, are what defines excitement.  So it’s ironic that rock and pop music, with intrinsically greater potential for dynamics and excitement, lack this quality entirely.

Algorythmix’ plug-based meter will probably be used by few normal folks.  But we can hope artists, engineers, producers and music professionals take notice.  If they do, music will quickly start sounding much better to us fans.

Interacting with Music on iPhones and iPod Touch

 

Here we go: check this piece from Create Digital Music » The Generative iPhone-iPod Touch.  Finally, it seems things are shaking off the dust of 20th Century music – rediscovering that music can be more than a spectator sport, the piece links to some cool interactive music, but also the tools you need to make it. Now we’re cookin’ with gas…

Has iPod Killed The Radio Star, Again?

Back during my days at Sound Images I was responsible for advancing the art and science of podcasting.  I’ve flexed those muscles further as a teacher, using podcasts academically; my students turn in most projects as podcasts!  So I was intrigue by a story I read (yeah, I know, reading is obsolete) in Peter Kafka’s column  on the AllThingsD blog about Radio Refugee Adam Carolla.  What’s interesting is this: Carolla elected to stick to podcasting, rather than seek another morning talk-radio gig.

This decision is interesting for a couple reasons.  First, it appears Adam Carolla’s audience has shrunk to the point where he wasn’t getting the kind of bucks he’s accustomed to, so he’s rolling the dice on this “new media thing.”  Still, a comedian with Carolla’s resume should be able to land a paying gig.  To trade a paycheck for a speculative project like this indicates radio’s erosion continues - the paycheck must not have been very steady!  Talk radio’s appeal is naturally limited, but the shift away from live broadcast to recorded media indicates the model is in trouble broadly. No surprise: Narrow, legal strictures make talk boring, while satellite and now podcasts let the talkers push any and every envelope.  But geek that I am, Carolla’s workflow and process led me to write this post.

Apparently Carolla is applying a principle we’ve been talking about for the past 5 years.  Continuous creation is a process that assumes interesting, useful products surround us.  A new creative role is to recognize, capture and re-package the ideas, images, sounds, or experiences in real time.  All information has value, but we can’t quantify that value when that data is created.  We have to wait.  Only application can unwrap the value of a given bit of information.  Carolla’s show differs from his radio work in it’s recognition and embrace of this creative shift.

According to Kafka, Carolla stumbled onto this paradigm naturally.  He’s been plugging away, doing random, uninterrupted talking on a daily basis.  It appears to be the classic internet startup, moving from a spare room at home to a rented garage.  This adds some costs, but the article pegs them at $3000/month.  No problem: Carolla is prohibited from earning a living with his mouth by a non-compete with his former bosses (been there, done that!), so he needs no steenkin’ revenue model.

This is good.  On a personal level, it can’t hurt Carolla’s chops to keep working the mic.  But in building an audience of 400,000+ listeners, he’s created something akin to a private-label radio station.  The real value of 800,000 ears is actually knowable, thanks to radio.  Carolla’s operations are tiny, far more efficient than any radio station, so he commands an audience of salable size with a much lower investment than his competition.  

It’s not yet obvious to The Powers That Be, but the value of those ears can grow in ways broadcast audiences cannot.  Podcast audiences are more similar to public radio listeners, focused on content and appreciative of curatorial talent.  They are more likely to support sponsors than commercial radio listeners, because those sponsors seem to share intrinsic values.  Public radio sponsorship works because listeners want to support businesses that support the programming they care about.  Well-integrated podcast promotion can have similar appeal.  Interesting times, as they say…

Finally: Off the Shelf SelfControl

So a guy named Steve Lambert has given me SelfControl. A cool little app that blocks access to incoming/outgoing social and networked media tools!  You select the biggest distractions, define the amount of access to grant yourself, and bob’s yer’ uncle!

EchoPost to Jay Reynolds’s Facebook Notes

My (real world) friend Jay Reynolds posted this interesting Note over on Facebook.

I had a thought.  I’ll repost the start of it here:

it’s easy to control multikilobuck audio interfaces with Apple Remote the dog-simplest controller since the Griffin blue glowing knob thingee. In other words, via iPod Touch or iPhone. Little things controlling/loading from big things. 

So now I’m thinking: what if everyone were recording all the time, via decent, but not magical bluetooth mics?  The applications are incredible, and not just for film/video.  In music we can imagine universal always-on multitrack recording with current tools.  Logic and Nuendo do incredible time-stretching out of the box, ProTools HD doesn’t suck, but might need some plug in help to git ‘r done transparently.  But even then… so what?  Good enough is what works to make a product.
It’s cheap and easy to think of the scary Big Brother problems, but more productive to think of technology in all it’s phases (military, industrial, commercial, domestic) as inevitable and put your energy into applications.  I’d argue most of that can be offset by ubiquity and true open-access.  
If everyone has equal and open access, the watchers will be the most-watched.  This isn’t a wild guess.  TV from the beginning has been dominated by cop shows of every format - sitcoms, musicals, animals, buddies alongside reality, fictionalized and fully fictional dramas.  Free always on cruiser-cams would be addictive.  As to protecting the cops, this is a valid, useful critique, which might validate how access is implemented, as well as guide police procedures.  Concern over how people will respond to events outside the time frame of the desired evidence will cause beneficial adjustments in behavior, and define professionalism more clearly.
People are naturally repelled by cruiser-cams of busts.  Lots of police departments  in Hamilton county use cameras that automagically run license plates as they drive (whether or not the officer wishes to or not, the computer is in charge).  Is it any wonder we fear stop-light cams?  Bad tactics and implementations don’t mean the tools or even the strategies are necessarily bad.
In this case it’s the opposite.  Open access to the tools will yield all sorts of tactics, good, bad and as awful as any the government comes up with.  But they will make us all aware of  the nature of our lives in this mediated world, while giving us access to things we’ve never imagined.  Already your iPhone can track your business mileage (and, if appropriate billable time) easier and more accurately than you can log it with a pad and pencil; tied to your iCal, it can do so automatically with little (or no) intervention on your part.  Personal freedom/time, manufactured by social/government network tools (GPS, 3G in this case).  Different technologies can do the same thing in a different way - an iPod touch can use wifi to autolocate when you check into your office, or pass a public network along the way.  Wouldn’t you like to check if anyone had cleared the parking side streets on the way to work on a snowy day?  
The technology for this costs less than the cams that do nothing more than give you tickets.  Public street-cams could provide that functionality in an inherently more just manner: they would require an actual officer to examine a real time video of the “violation” to determine whether or not the individual was operating in an unsafe manner.  It would allow the officer to easily (as automagically as they can run the plates of cars they pass today) distinguish between daily commuters and strangers.  This would form the basis of a new kind of “vision” for the beat cop and citizen alike: a shared public view of the world around them, created by this rich data stream.  Again - these applications not only exist already on the police side, newer better-intentioned public applications would quickly spring up, allowing commuters to plan shorter trips and hip people to possible ride-shares, by whatever criteria you feel comfortable with.  These coins have two sides.
Always on recording.  Audio, for sure. Video, why not?  I’m talking the personal level here still.  But when you think it through it’s easy to imagine all kinds of public applications for the same thing, that are more positive than the ideas out there now.
-d-

Next Page »